Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://koreai.mintlify.app/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

​
Why You Cannot Vibe Code Production Agents

Objection addressed: “AI coding tools (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) let me build agents myself. You have great features, but so can I — eventually.”
For the full analysis of why AI coding tools solve the coding problem but not the agent platform problem, see Why a New Platform. That article covers:
  1. The Representation Problem — Why agent definition needs a purpose-built language, not framework code
  2. The Governance Ceiling — Why guardrails at scale require a governance engine, not one-off API calls
  3. The Tool Ecosystem — Why tool calling and a tool platform are fundamentally different
  4. The Interface Trap — Why AI should program abstractions (ABL), not implementations (Python glue)
  5. The Invisible Problems — Why observability and organizational scale are existential, not optional

​
The Pitch

You can build an agent in a day. We spent years building the platform so that agent still works on day 1,000. AI coding tools are incredible — and they are part of our story, not competition to it. Use AI to program agents in a purpose-built language that compiles to a runtime designed for production. Do not use AI to reinvent infrastructure that needs to handle auth, protocols, governance, multi-agent orchestration, observability, and organizational scale. Every enterprise that builds their own agent infra follows the same path: prototype — “we need guardrails” — “we need observability” — “we need tool management” — “we need versioning” — “we need compliance” — “we need to support 50 teams.” Each step is a quarter of engineering time they didn’t plan for. We have already walked that path. Build on top of where we are, not from where we were.